Posts

Banking Security Guidelines Go Into Effect in January 2012

/in /by

As banking applications evolve, common attacks on banks are becoming correspondingly more sophisticated. Small businesses, municipalities, and moneyed individuals are often targeted for obvious reasons: they have hundreds of thousands of dollars, if not a few million, in the bank, but their security is often no more effective than that of an average American household.

The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council’s (FFIEC) updated security guidelines go into effect in less than a month. It is imperative that financial institutions recognize that the security precautions currently in place are ineffective in the face of new, more sophisticated attacks. Criminals have gotten around the minor hurdles posed by the tools being used to authenticate clients and prevent unauthorized transactions.

Basic multifactor authentication may be relatively effective for bank accounts that generally contain only enough to pay a month’s worth of bills. But high value accounts are more prone to attacks, and require additional levels of security. Ultimately, what is most important is that a security program includes multiple layers of protection rather than relying on a single mechanism of defense.

Using advanced device identification is also essential. The FFIEC suggests complex device identification, which is more advanced than previous techniques, and the leader in this space is iovation Inc.  They take complex device identification much further by delivering to financial institutions, a reputation of the device as it accesses their site to apply for credit, create an account, transfer money and more.
This proven strategy not only utilizes advanced methods to identify the devices being used to connect to a bank, it also incorporates geolocation, velocity, anomalies, proxy busting, webs of associations, fraud histories, commercially applied evidence of fraud or abuse, and much more to protect financial institutions from cybercrime.

Robert Siciliano, personal security and identity theft expert contributor to iovation, discusses credit and debit card fraud on CNBC. Disclosures

Javelin Study Shows Increased Credit Card Fraud Risk

/in /by

Consumers, businesses, retailers, and even the media are becoming numb to news about data breaches. Not a week goes by when we don’t hear of another major breach affecting thousands or even millions of customer accounts.

Criminal hackers are getting smarter and savvier all the time, and they often have better technology than the banks and retailers tasked with protecting your data.

Time reported on a recent Javelin Strategy and Research survey in which Javelin analyzed 23 of the biggest credit card issuers’ online security practices. When companies were graded on a 100-point scale, the average result was just 59. Javelin head of security and risk analyst Phil Blank, who authored the study, explained, “The good news is issuers are doing a better job overall of resolution, but that’s the easiest thing to do. Prevention is the hardest to do but it’s got the biggest payback.”

The report also found that for a full year after your bank account information has been hacked, there is a strong chance that you will be a victim of credit card fraud. So even though you may be getting a little hardened to data breach warnings, you still need to watch your credit card statements closely. As long as you dispute unauthorized credit card charges within 60 days, federal laws limit liability to $50. Unauthorized debit card charges must be reported within two days, or liability jumps to $500.

One of the FFIEC’s recommendations for financial institutions involves using complex device identification. iovation, an Oregon-based security firm, offers an advanced device identification service that incorporates real-time risk assessments, the history of fraud on linked devices (such as chargebacks, identity theft and credit application fraud) and exposes fraudsters working together to steal from online businesses.

“Complex device identification” involves the creation of a digital fingerprint based on several characteristics of the device including hardware and software configuration, Internet protocol addresses, and geolocation. Unfortunately, complex device ID by itself only increases the strength of identification; it does little to increase the efficacy of an overall anti-fraud strategy.

“Device reputation” offers all of the security measures that complex device ID does, but it also strategically incorporates velocity, anomalies, proxy busting, webs of associations (linking devices and accounts), and fraud and abuse histories. Device reputation moves from a micro to a macro view of transactions which takes into account how particular devices behave or have behaved beyond its activities with a financial institution, its usage by a current user or other users, and/or its relationship to other devices.  This chart explains what is involved with each:

Leading financial institutions aren’t merely complying with the FFIEC’s security recommendations, but are going beyond it by incorporating device reputation and other authentication and anti-fraud tools into their layered security approach.

Robert Siciliano, personal security and identity theft expert contributor to iovation, discusses credit and debit card fraud on CNBC. Disclosures

Financial Institutions Can Protect Their Clients Using “Defense in Depth”

/in /by

Back in 2005, the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) made security recommendations for banks and financial institutions in response to the increase of cybercrime. Since then, banks have implemented most, if not all, of these guidelines, and cyber criminals have responded by challenging each layer of security, by exploiting different technologies or coming up with new hacking techniques.

The latest security recommendations strongly suggest a layered or “defense-in-depth” approach, which the National Security Agency defines as a practical strategy for achieving Information Assurance in today’s highly networked environments. It is a “best practices” strategy in that it relies on the intelligent application of techniques and technologies that exist today. The strategy strikes a balance between the protection capability and cost, performance, and operational considerations.

The FFIEC recommends that financial institutions replace simple device identification with complex device identification, which most banks had already implemented long ago. Therefore, the next evolution of security is device reputation management, incorporating geolocation, velocity, anomalies, proxy busting, browser language, associations, fraud histories, and time zone differences. iovation, an Oregon-based security firm, offers this service and more.

The FFIEC also recommends that financial institutions replace challenge questions, which are often fact-based questions, and can be easy to figure out with the use social networking data, with “Out of Wallet” (OOW) questions that don’t rely on publicly available information.

Challenge questions include, “What’s your mother’s maiden name?” “What’s your Social Security Number?” “What are your kids’ names?” or “When were you born?” OOW questions are generally opinion-based, such as, “What is your favorite vacation spot?” “What is your favorite flavor of ice cream?” or “What is your favorite book?”

Keir Breitenfeld, Senior Director of Experian Decision Analytics recently joined Device Reputation pioneer and leader, iovation, for a webinar presentation addressing the FFIEC guidelines.  You can listen to his presentation on applying proportional treatment to risk-based authentication efforts and dynamically managing credit and non-credit data questions to mitigate fraud via the webinar.

Ultimately, financial institutions must implement a layered approach to security. iovation’s device reputation service is a must-have layer that contributes greatly to a defense-in-depth approach, assessing risk throughout multiple points on an institution’s website.

Robert Siciliano, personal security and identity theft expert contributor to iovation, discusses credit and debit card fraud on CNBC. Disclosures

FFIEC Mandates “System Of Layered Security” to Combat Fraud

/in /by

For any cave-dwelling, living-under-a-rock, head-in-the-sand, naïve, under-informed members of society who aren’t paying attention, we have serious cyber-security issues on our hands.

Black hat hackers, who break into networks to steal for financial gain, are wreaking havoc on banks, retailers, online gaming websites, and social media. Black hats cost these companies and their clients billions of dollars every year. They are using stolen usernames and passwords to transfer money through wire transfers, Automated Clearing House (ACH) and through billing fraud.

The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC) has repeatedly implored that come January 2012, any lagging financial institutions will be required to significantly upgrade their security protocol. Since any existing form of authentication can be compromised, the FFIEC recommends that financial institutions should institute systems of “layered security.”

Previous FFIEC recommendations discussed authentication, suggesting that the security issue takes place when a user logs in. But in fact, not all the danger occurs at login. Other website integration points are vulnerable to security issues, particularly at the point when money is transferred.

According to the FFIEC’s recent update:

“Fraudsters use keyloggers to steal the logon ID, password, and challenge question answers of financial institution customers. This information alone or in conjunction with stolen browser cookies loaded on the fraudster’s PC may enable the fraudster to log into the customer’s account and transfer funds to accounts controlled by the fraudster, usually through wire or ACH transactions.”

One of the FFIEC’s recommendations for financial institutions involves complex device identification. iovation, an Oregon-based security firm, goes a step further offering Device Reputation, which builds on complex device identification with real-time risk assessments, the history of fraud on groups of devices, and their relationships with other devices and accounts which exposes fraudsters working together to steal from online businesses.

Smart financial institutions aren’t just complying with the FFIEC’s security recommendations, but are going beyond by incorporating device reputation into their layered security approach.

Robert Siciliano, personal security and identity theft expert contributor to iovation, discusses another databreach on Good Morning America. (Disclosures)

Why Complex Device Identification Isn’t Enough

/in /by

“Simple device identification” relies on cookies or IP addresses to confirm that a customer is logging in from the same PC that was used to create the account.

The Financial Federal Institutions Examination Council has explained the fallibility of this system:

“Experience has shown this type of cookie may be copied and moved to a fraudster’s PC, allowing the fraudster to impersonate the legitimate customer. Device identification has also been implemented using geo-location or Internet protocol address matching. However, increasing evidence has shown that fraudsters often use proxies, which allow them to hide their actual location and pretend to be the legitimate user.

“Complex device identification” is more sophisticated. This security technique relies on disposable, one-time cookies, and creates a complex digital fingerprint based on characteristics including PC configuration, Internet protocol addresses, and geolocation. According to the FFIEC, complex device identification is more secure, and institutions should no longer consider simple device identification adequate.

While complex device ID is more sophisticated, the next level of security is Device Reputation. This strategy incorporates geolocation, velocity, anomalies, proxy busting, webs of associations, fraud histories, commercially applied evidence of fraud or abuse, and more.

According to Max Anhoury, Vice President of Global Sales for iovation, “Financial institutions looking to stop fraud while reducing friction for good customers must tie together multiple layers of fraud and risk management for a holistic layered approach. Just this week, iovation presented to hundreds of financial services Info Security professionals and business managers regarding the recent FFIEC guidance (along with Experian Decision Analytics) about finding the optimal process points to strike the right balance between fraud prevention, customer experience and cost.” You can listen to the FFIEC-related webinar presentation at: www.iovation.com/ffiec

If you work in the information security industry, complex device identification is nothing new. While the FFIEC recommends complex identification, you should really be doing something more. The truly forward-thinking have already moved on and are successfully leveraging the benefits of Device Reputation and shared device intelligence.

Simple device identification was in place before the FFIEC mandated it. Now they have mandated complex device identification, but leading InfoSec professionals are already doing more to protect their retail or commercial banking customers, by using device reputation.

Robert Siciliano, personal security and identity theft expert contributor to iovation, discusses credit and debit card fraud on CNBC. Disclosures

The Benefits of Multifactor Authentication

/in /by

The Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council (FFIEC), a formal government interagency body empowered to prescribe uniform principles, standards, and report forms for the federal examination of financial institutions, recently issued a supplement to the 2005 document “Authentication in an Internet Banking Environment” effective January 2012. The FFIEC has acknowledged that cybercrime is increasing and financial institutions need to increase their security and that of their customers.

Specifically the FFIEC states: “Since virtually every authentication technique can be compromised, financial institutions should not rely solely on any single control for authorizing high risk transactions, but rather institute a system of layered security, as described herein.”

This means the simple “username/password” combination for accessing your online banking is ineffective. And that banks should “adjust their customer authentication controls as appropriate in response to new threats to customers’ online accounts” and “financial institutions should implement more robust controls as the risk level of the transaction increases.”

The FFIEC’s previous statement implies it is encouraging the use of dual customer authorization typically seen when using digital security devices including smartcards and password generating key fobs.

This is where multifactor authentication comes in. Multifactor is generally something the user knows like a password plus something the user has like a smart card and/or something the user is like a fingerprint. In its simplest form, it is when a website asks for a four digit credit card security code from a credit card, or if our bank requires us to add a second password for our account.

Some institutions offer or require a key fob that provides a changing second password (one-time password) in order to access accounts, or reply to a text message to approve a transaction. All of this extra security is good for you.

Like Mom used to say, “Broccoli: like it or not, it’s for your own good.”

These measures provide layers of protection, which allow you to enjoy the convenience of online services with minimal risk. The benefits of logging in online and adding an extra code is far more convenient than schlepping all the way to the bank in person.

Robert Siciliano, personal security expert contributor to Just Ask Gemalto.

What The FFIEC Is Doing to Protect You and Your Bank

/in /by

FFIEC is the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council which is a government body empowered to prescribe uniform principles, standards and report forms for the federal examination of financial institutions by and for numerous other government, public, private and financial entities.

If there is a “good” place for your tax dollars to head, it’s to the FFIEC. And very recently the FFIEC has issued updated guidelines for financial institutions in regards to their cyber security and new threats your bank needs to counter.

Over the past decade as we have all (mostly) have banked and bought stuff online, criminals have formed organized web mobs to sniff out transactions and take over existing accounts and in some cases open up new accounts.

The FFIEC has certainly pointed this out and at the same time has made additional security recommendations since the last time they did in 2005 based on new kinds of criminal hacking and new technologies to combat it.

Hacking in its many forms involves compromising a system from numerous vantage points. A network can be hacked from the inside by an employee or former employee with credentialed access or from the outside by seeking vulnerabilities in a networks technology. But more often hacking takes place when an account holders access such as username and passwords are compromised.

To defend against all of these hacks the FFIEC recommends to financial institutions what’s called a “layered approach” of anti-fraud tools and techniques to combat crime. Meaning it’s not simply a matter of applying a firewall and having anti-virus to protect the network, but going much deeper in protecting many interaction points within the banking site (not just login) and using a variety of proven fraud prevention solutions.

That includes sophisticated methods of identifying devices and knowing their reputation (past and current behavior and other devices they are associated with) the moment they touch the banking website. The FFIEC has recognized complex device identification strategies as a viable solution that’s already proven strong at very large financial institutions. ReputationManager360 by iovation leads the charge with device reputation encompassing identification and builds on device recognition with real-time risk assessment, uniquely leveraging both the attributes and the behavior of the device.

Robert Siciliano, personal security and identity theft expert contributor to iovation, discusses identity theft in front of the National Speakers Association. (Disclosures)